# Open-beta results form — 0.12.0 RC

## Participant and environment

- Participant ID:
- Role: Designer / Developer
- Distribution: Native Modes / Starter Compat
- Figma plan:
- Figma web or desktop:
- Browser/OS:
- Date:
- Observer:

## Task record

Complete one row per task in `../BETA-TEST-GUIDE.md`.

| Task | Completed without help | Time | Error/hesitation | Evidence link | Defect ID |
|---|---|---:|---|---|---|
| Designer 1 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Designer 2 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Designer 3 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Designer 4 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Designer 5 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Designer 6 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Designer 7 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Designer 8 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Developer 1 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Developer 2 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Developer 3 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Developer 4 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Developer 5 |  |  |  |  |  |

## Structured ratings

Use 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree.

- I could find the correct starting point: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
- Component and variable names were understandable: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
- Responsive behavior was clear enough to implement: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
- Error, loading and empty states were complete: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
- The package felt safe to adapt without detaching/rebuilding: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5

## Exit questions

1. What was the hardest part?
2. What did you expect to find but could not?
3. What would stop you from using this in real work?
4. What saved the most time?
5. What single improvement would make it worth paying for?

## Contact and quotation permission

- May StudioLimb contact you about this test? Yes / No
- May StudioLimb use an anonymized summary of this feedback? Yes / No
- Public attribution or direct quotation requires a separate written approval after the exact wording is shown to the participant.
